Does delta neutrophil index predict 30-day mortality in patients admitted tointensive care unit via emergency department?

Objective@#A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the usefulness of the delta neutrophil index as a prognosticfactor for mortality in intensive care unit patients admitted via the emergency department. @*Methods@#Patients, who presented to the emergency department and were admitted to the intensive care unit fromJanuary 2018 to August 2018, were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical features, inflammatory marker levels, such asC-reactive protein, lactate, simplified acute physiology score 3, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality were obtainedfrom the medical records. Patients, who visited the emergency department because of trauma or suicidal attempts,arrived after out-hospital cardiac arrest, or were diagnosed with cerebrovascular disease, were excluded. @*Results@#Of the 310 patients included, 65 died during their admission, and 245 patients were discharged after treatment.The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the delta neutrophil index (area under curve [AUC], 0.72), Creactiveprotein (AUC, 0.70), lactate (AUC, 0.64), and simplified acute physiology score 3 (AUC, 0.79) indicated a lowpredictive power for in-hospital mortality. Whole patients were divided into four subgroups (infectious diseases, cardiovasculardiseases, gastrointestinal bleeding diseases, and others). The receiver operating curve of delta neutrophil indexrevealed infectious diseases (AUC, 0.65), in cardiovascular diseases (AUC, 0.70), and gastrointestinal bleeding diseases(AUC, 0.79). @*Conclusion@#The role of the delta neutrophil index for predicting the prognosis of in-hospital mortality showed equally lowpredictive power for critically ill patients with the C-reactive protein and lactate.

Validation of Glasgow-Blatchford score, Pre-Rockall score, and AIMS65 score to predict active bleeding in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in normotensive patients and suggestion for developing new predictors

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), Pre-Rockall score (PRS), and AIMS65 score to predict active bleeding in patients with normotension and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), and analyze the variables that can predict active bleeding to help develop new predictive factors. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from January 2015 to December 2017. A systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg were defined as normotension, and the patients were divided into active bleeding and not-active bleeding groups based on an esophagogastroduodenoscopy and levin-tube irrigation. The GBS, PRS, and AIMS65 of each group were calculated. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were also calculated to obtain the predictive power for active bleeding. Furthermore, the factors that can predict active bleeding were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The ROC curve and AUC were calculated using the variables that were adopted as useful factors. RESULTS: Of the 250 patients included, 85 were active bleeding and 165 were not-active bleeding. The ROC curve showed GBS (AUC, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47–0.61), PRS (AUC, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50–0.65), and AIMS65 (AUC, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.43–0.59) to have low predictive power for active bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression revealed the lactate (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01–1.20) and shock indices (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 1.12–15.40) to be significant predictors of active bleeding. When calculating the probability of predicting active bleeding through these variables, AUC 0.64 (95% CI, 0.57–0.71) showed higher prediction power than the previous scores. CONCLUSION: The conventional scoring systems that predict the prognosis of UGIB showed low predictability in predicting active bleeding in UGIB patients with a systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg. Further study suggests the development of new score using factors, such as the lactate and shock indices.

Does the use of bedside ultrasonography reduce emergency department length of stay for patients with renal colic?: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding bedside ultrasonography to the diagnostic algorithm for nephrolithiasis on emergency department (ED) length of stay. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study was conducted from October 2014 to December 2014 with patients with acute flank pain. In the non-ultrasonography group (NUSG), non-contrast computed tomography was selected based on clinical features and hematuria in the urinalysis. In the ultrasonography group (USG), non-contrast computed tomography was selected based on clinical features and hydronephrosis on bedside ultrasonography. The primary outcome was ED length of stay. The secondary outcomes were radiation exposure, amount of analgesics, proportion of patients with diseases other than ureteral calculus, and proportion of patients with unexpected ED revisits within 7 days from the index visit. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were enrolled (NUSG, 51; USG, 52). The ED length of stay for the USG (89.0 minutes) was significantly shorter than that for the NUSG (163.0 minutes, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the radiation exposure dose (5.29 and 5.08 mSv, respectively; P=0.392), amount of analgesics (P=0.341), proportion of patients with diseases other than ureteral calculus (13.0% and 6.8%, respectively; P=0.486), and proportion of patients with unexpected ED revisits within 7 days from the index visit (7.8% and 9.6%, respectively; P=1.000). CONCLUSION: The use of early bedside ultrasonography for patients with acute flank pain could reduce the ED length of stay without increasing unexpected ED revisits.